☞ Wiki-this-and-that

  • While the creative commons license that covers Wikipedia allows it, this attempt to divert traffic away from Wikipedia without adding any significant value to either the pages or the community looks like it’s in very poor taste.
  • Wikileaks is not part of Wikipedia
    This may seem obvious to lots of people, but the way WikiMedia Foundation uses “wiki-” as a prefix for all its products makes it a reasonable assumption that Wikileaks is part of the Wikipedia empire. It’s not, and it’s not even a wiki.
  • United States diplomatic cables leak
    If you’ve been wondering what all this Wikileaks stuff is all about, the Wikipedia page provides an excellent and detailed overview. So detailed, in fact, that I’d expect it to come under the same sort of political pressure to remove it as Amazon and Paypal caved to.

☞ Decisions

  • Definitive explanation from Bruce Schneier why the nude scanners at airports are a waste of money, and why the will always be accmpanied by unreasonably invasive personal searches.
  • Excellent decision here. They could have done this at absolutely any time, but I’m pleased they’ve done it now.

☆ Small Is Beautiful – wmk.me

New Forest DonkeyOn a whim I decided to go look for a domain name for my own link shortener. Within a few minutes I’d found that wmk.me was available, and even better that GoDaddy were selling it for $8.99 for the first year. I grabbed it and then went looking for something to do with it.

I have a Google Apps account for hosting some of my activities, and I discovered they have added a Google Labs link shortening service. It was very easy to set up, but its main drawback is they only allow link shortening using a subdomain. If you see any links for me on the domain l.wmk.me they are hosted by Google.

I then spotted that my current favourite link manager, bit.ly, offers a bit.ly Pro service which allows you to use your own domain with bit.ly – everything else is the same as the normal service and it gets used automatically. I requested access to the service and heard back from them within a few hours. It was extremely easy to set up as well – although one part took a day waiting for DNS to propogate changes that verified my domain ownership – and I’m very pleased with it. Any links on wmk.me are hosted there, and I’m able to use both it and Google’s service at the same time.

The one gap in both services is what happens if (when) I decide to migrate away. I don’t intend to use these short links in any non-transient context, but it would be good to know that there is a workable export option available on both services so that I am free to leave. But for now I have a new toy to play with. It’d the small things that provide the best entertainment.

☝ Defending Wikileaks’ Ability To Exist

Logo used by Wikileaks

Image via Wikipedia

Let me say up front that I am not a massive fan of WikiLeaks. It seems to me that taking stolen correspondence and publishing it for everyone to read is a fundamentally sociopathic act, whether it is a rival’s love-letters or a government’s diplomatic cables. There’s no doubt that there’s a role for whistle-blowing journalism, but each betrayal of trust and privacy needs to be justified by the greater good it delivers, and I remain unconvinced that the cloud of hacktivists at WikiLeaks has taken on board that the demand for great responsibility to accompany great power also applies to them.

For me, it falls into the same category as The Pirate Bay; there’s plenty to disagree with in what they are doing, but the crisis they provoke is fundamental to the operation of the Internet. In reacting to WikiLeaks and The Pirate Bay, both business and government have shown their true colours when it comes to citizen liberty and software freedoms. What’s disclosed is not pretty.

Read on over at ComputerWorldUK

☞ Constructive Criticism

  • What Court doesn’t mention in the book is that lenses can also be used to turn a very small amount of light into a raging fire. This appears to be his strategy with Google, taking nearly any tidbit that emerges about Google and turning it into an opportunity to bash the company.

    This is very easy to do and I am constantly checking myself to avoid it.

  • Stirring and worthwhile “modest proposal” by Bruce Schneier.
  • “The Department of Health has yet to recognise the hugely positive management leverage that open source can bring to bear in a change programme as large as its information revolution. Open standards in proprietary systems have not and cannot deliver ‘openness’ on their own and ‘presumption’ is no substitute for strategy.”

☞ Links for Dec 12

☞ Open and Equal

  • LibreOffice hosts The Document Foundation have put together a set of bylaws for their new open-by-rule community and are looking for feedback.
  • Interesting survey my Henrik Ingo puts data behind the conjecture that it’s better to have an open-bt-rule community that grows the addressable market for your project than to have a captive market that doesn’t scale beyond the “glass ceiling” of the maximum size sustainable by a company.

☝ Crowdsource is not open source

I’ve heard a few conversations in the last week treating open source interchangeably with crowdsourcing. Despite sounding the same they are very different, and the key difference is the ownership of the outcome. Open source is not the same as crowdsourcing because open source community members are stakeholders whereas crowdsourcers get less than sharecroppers.

Read on at ComputerWorldUK

☞ Hidden Motives

  • Michael Geist shrewdly observes that, far from being the exclusive domain of military diplomacy as might be deduced from coverage, the Wikileaks diplomatic cables uncover the fact that huge numbers of “intellectual property” issues are involved. Many of us have known for a long time that the US acts on behalf of its biggest companies in advancing a restrictive global copyright, patent and trademark regime, and we may well be about to see just how often they bully other countries over strictly commercial matters.
  • Looks like a great way to ensure you receive an “enhanced pat-down” from humourless, over-empowered, unaccountable and underpaid security people who don’t see any kind of joke no matter how cool you think it is.

☞ For Your Safety

  • With WikiLeaks back in the news, this story from 2009 is more relevant than ever. Having rendered WikiLeaks “illegal” last year, it’s now easy to target it without causing a stir. Banning links is simply pointless as it’s easily circumvented and inapplicable outside their jurisdiction. Once someone makes that clear, the next step could be to criminalise clicking on links to banned sites (perhaps as part of the proposed ISP filtering), at which point we’ve got to “thought police” living. This is the web equivalent of “security theatre” and it’s to be despised anywhere it shows up.
  • Excellent article by Bruce Schneier sets the benchmark for any future discussion and clearly identifies the problem as politicians and civil servants covering their backsides instead of making people as safe as possible.
  • The product is amazingly ridiculous, but the “customer reviews” have become a creative writing contest without peer.
  • Very reasonable and balanced commentary from Mark Wielaard calls for the licence terms surrounding JDK7 and 8 to be reconsidered in the light of the need for open source communities to be able to freely work with the specifications.